29 September 2018

Fisking St James

JMJ

The Readings for the 26th Sunday of Ordinary Time (B2)

Come now, you rich, weep and wail over your impending miseries.

Remember that we - in the USA - are the rich. Doesn't matter how much you earn, doesn't matter how much you make or how many kids you have. Married? Single? On Welfare? If you're reading this over the internet you have more money than huge swathes of the world. 

Your wealth has rotted away, your clothes have become moth-eaten, your gold and silver have corroded,

Yet, you know it's worthless. You know it has no power to buy happiness, no power to buy love. You know it can facsimilate both. And you're probably ok, at least sometimes, with the imitations. They are not so expensive as to be prohibitive.

and that corrosion will be a testimony against you;
it will devour your flesh like a fire.

You may know - and not care - or you may not know: they are killing your soul. Each indulgence in those facsimiles preps you for hell. We have only two choices in this world: practice for living in heaven or practice for living in hell.

You have stored up treasure for the last days.

Which will it be? Heavenly treasure or hellish? You may enjoy either - but it will be in the same place, for you will be in the eternal presence of God.  God is a consuming fire: will it mean that you are holy fire yourself or will you be consumed?

Behold, the wages you withheld from the workers

In Apple's factories, in the restraunts where you did not tip, in the clothing factoris that filled up WalMart and JC Penny's, in the factories you closed, the Casinos you shut down, the neighborhoods you gentrified shoving out the poor... 

who harvested your fields are crying aloud;
and the cries of the harvesters
have reached the ears of the Lord of hosts.

In your fields now your food lies rotting because you refused to pays the laborers their due, and now have shut the gates against even the poor whose money you stole. You are surrounded now by the very rot of your wealth.

You have lived on earth in luxury and pleasure;

Yet you did not pay full price. The dirt and pollution of your glut you left for others to clean, your landfills hide your superfluity of filth, your streets are filled with your squalor.

you have fattened your hearts for the day of slaughter.

And when the revolution comes you wil be too fat to run.

You have condemned;
you have murdered the righteous one;

he offers you no resistance.

For he dies in the womb so that you can have a "rich and full life". 

26 September 2018

What's love got to do with it?

JMJ

The Readings for the Memorial of St Vincent de Paul
Thursday ihthe 25th Week of Ordinary Time (B2)
Deus, qui sacrae legis omnia constituta in tua et proximi dilectione posuisti...
O God, whou founded all the commands of your sacred Law upon love of you and of our neighbor...

As I've mentioned before Dom Mark advises preachers to "preach the propers". I've been wrestling with this idea all week and it finally hit me when I saw that the memorial of St Vincent de Paul was upon us. The name of St Vincent de Paul is probably most often connected in our minds with one of the most active charities in all the world, which, itself, is part of the Largest Charity Organization in the world, in all history.

No Christian can even claim the name if there is no active charity in their life. we do this each to our ability and our calling: in his latter days my grandfather gave away literally the entire family inheritance to a Church in his tiny town in north Georgia. The blessings of that action still rebound to our family. God gave us stuffonly to give it away, to share with others, with those who have nothing. Even when I think I have nothing, I always meet someone who has less. Our charity, though, is not our love.

Fr Z notesthat this prayer came into the Roman mass via an ancient Italian liturgical tradition and he sites a passage in St Matthew which seems to be the source of this prayer:
“But when the Pharisees heard that he had silenced the Sadducees, they came together. And one of them, a lawyer, asked him a question, to test him. ‘Teacher, which is the great commandment in the law?’ And he said to him, ‘You shall love the Lord your God with all your heart, and with all your soul, and with all your mind. This is the great and first commandment. And a second is like it, You shall love your neighbor as yourself. On these two commandments depend all the law and the prophets’” (Matthew 22:34-40).
And there's this citation from St Thomas Aquinas' commentary on the passage:
When man is loved, God is loved, since man is the image of God.
So what is love?

St Thomas has us there, as well: To love is to will the good of another.

Good, also: is very well defined. God is good. God is the ultimate good. Yes, charity and acts of service are important, but God is the final and and goal of all being: if you're not willing someone else to God-wards, you are not acting in love.

As Fr Z points out, "All of the Law is summed up in Jesus’ two-fold command of love of God and neighbor. The first part of the two-fold law is about unconditional love of God. The second follows as its consequence. We must cultivate our different loves in their proper order. God comes first, always. Always."

We have it in our mushy liberal hearts that "love" has something to do with "don't judge me". We have set up the idea that God wants us to open the doors and let everyone in, like a 24/7 Denny's. Love is not a "second hand emotion" but rather the driving force that created the universe. It sends us to hell and back in service to another person. It will not settle for second best. It weeps over the addict anddraws her away from her addiction. It can be gentle, nearly passive; or love can be tough to the point of self-destruction in the name of rescuing another.

We cannot love another by simply saying, "Do what ever makes you happy". For our end and ultimate Good is God. And to walk away from God in any way is not to be acting to one's own Good.

But how do you will the good of another and yet woo them? How do you notcondemn and yet not condone? How do you call someone Godward without pushing them away?




24 September 2018

Poets of the Logos

JMJ

The Readings for Tuesday in the 25th Week of Ordinary Time (B2)
Mater mea et fratres mei hi sunt, qui verbum Dei audiunt et faciunt.
My Mother and Brothers are those who are hearing and doing the Word of God.

Jesus, like his brother, James, makes much of those who Hear AND Do. James and Jesus both link up the same Greek words for this (James 1:22 and here in Luke 8:21). Although the English wants a pronoun as an object here, neither the Greek nor the Latin have one: the Latin says "Who the Word of God hear and do" and the Greek says "who the word of God are hearing and doing." (I Stand to be corrected on the tenses there, but I think I read aright.)

This is important because the Greek word that Luke (and James) picked here for "word" is not the usual one that means "teaching" but rather "Logos" which means far more. One might say the "Mind of God", or even the "Organizing Principle of God". The very pattern of God woven into all of Creation. This Logos is so important that it is, in fact, a title of Jesus, who is called the Logos incarnate. Through Luke, Jesus (and also St James) are inviting us to hear-and-do the Logos using a Greek word (poieo) meaning "maker" or "creator". They are inviting us to become poets of the Logos.

This theme runs through Jesus's teachings in so many ways: not burying your talents, not hiding your light under a bushel, not stepping out of God's moral plan for you life. Hearing-and-doing the Logos makes so much more sense than "Following your bliss". St James said on Sunday, "You ask but you do not receive because you ask to satisfy your passions". The primary message of the Cross is that your life is not about you. You don't get to do anything you want. You get to do what you were born to do which is to serve as God served when he lived among us.

We don't like that. Americans far prefer rebels, as I noted about yesterday's readings. Even though she spent her entire life in humble obedience to the Church - even kicking out a cofounder who wanted to get married after his divorce - Dorothy Day is remembered as a Rebel. Double Ditto for St Francis. Faithful children of the church are not welcomed models for us today. We don't like to think of Dorothy as a "supporter of patriarchy" nor Francis of Assisi writing pained letters about sloppy liturgics. We want hippies and uppity women to make our history. Jesus wants poets who can dance within the pattern laid down by God, his Father and ours.


Jesus says that hearing-and-doing makes one his Mother and his Brother. James, his brother, says the same thing. And Mary, his mother (but James' stepmother) would know full well what dancing with the Logos can mean. But James and Jesus, now, they get this from Mary's Husband, Joseph the Craftsman. He knew how to work with wood like a poet. He knew how to work with the grain of wood, how to make beauty in tune with nature. And yet, because he worked with his hands, he would have been part of an underclass in both Jewish and Roman cultures.

The true artisan knows that about his craft, bread-baking, wood working, wordsmithing, iron mongery, gardening, child-rearing, music, stained glass... we all participate that way in the Divine Nature as we mirror the Divine Craftsman. Jesus calls us to participate in that ongoing creative process as that image of God in us is our salvation.

Go be poets of the logos. Work out your salvation.

Think Different

Good Ol' Uncle Al
JMJ

The Readings for Monday in the 25th Week of Ordinary Time (B2)
Ne aemuleris hominem injustum, nec imiteris vias ejus. 
Envy not the unjust man, and do not follow his ways.

America has a problem with rebels. We started with the violent overthrow of our lawful king. We used advanced wordplay to justify what only a couple of generations before would have been a sin. Indeed our whole Anglophone culture is based on the same sort of thing, really. For what was the English schism if not the overthrow of a lawful authority?

We like rebels. But we fail to recognize that all rebels are the same: the essential argument is always, "I will do what I will. This shall be the whole of my law." This non-argument is used to justify even contradictory ideas: like belief in evolution and also in non-reproductive sex. We rebel against any form of authority including our own. And we envy the folks who do it best: we want to emulate them.

Why can't I inherit, we ask, all of my money from my parents, ruin every business I touch, cheat on several of my spouses, be emotionally abusive, lie, cheat, gamble, and still be President and a hero to millions?

America has a problem with rebels. All of our movies (even the good ones) are about rebels: what is It's A Wonderful Life about if not fiscal rebellion? Gone With The Wind is not just about "The Rebel South" but also about a woman rebelling against social norms and running her own life. The Korean war was about a Rebel General. MASH is commentary about rebels in the Vietnam War disguised as a story about rebels in the Korean War. We think the Rebellion in Star Wars is the Good Guys. In our mythology, Jesus was a rebel. We pay no attention to the fact that he adhered to rather traditional Jewish teachings on many front and that even some of his more "rebellious" lines are from one or another Jewish rabbinical tradition. Jesus is not a rebel, but he does have peculiar opinions.

We see this play out in the Church as well: as the entire America Church is filled with Rebels of one sort or another. Yes, there are the liberal sorts who toss off moral strictures, but there are the conservative sorts who align themselves with Steve Bannon and stick up for political leaders who abuse women. These are all our Rebels against the Pope. There are in Orthodoxy white supremacists who won't even let their women dress in traditional, Orthodox ways because it looks "too Muslim."

We like rebels - even the ones we say we don't like.

The problem is that this leads us to some awkward places in our moral life. If we elevate these folks so high on our cultural ranking, where does that leave us, faithful Catholics, who try to adhere to the moral order propounded by our Church exactly because it is the moral order propounded by our Church? Yeah, sure, there's an element of "rebel" in it because in today's world looking like Davey and Goliath, or Ward and June Cleaver (or even the Brady Bunch) is a rebellion of a sort. But it is an acquiescence to an authority as well. There is no such thing as a Christian Anarchist.

Unless you're a rebel.

23 September 2018

The Lord will uphold my Life.

JMJ

The Readings for the 25th Sunday of Ordinary Time (B2)
Videamus ergo si sermones illius veri sint, et tentemus quae ventura sunt illi, et sciemus quae erunt novissima illius. Si enim est verus filius Dei, suscipiet illum, et liberabit eum de manibus contrariorum... Erit enim ei respectus ex sermonibus illius.
Let us see if his words are true, and let us test what will happen at the end of his life; for if the righteous man is God's son, he will help him, and will deliver him from the hand of his adversaries... According to what he says, he will be protected.

You want to see something funny? In 1970 when the Russian Communists wanted allies in the USA, they made the Russian Orthodox Church give what's called "Autocephaly" or Self-governance to the Orthodox Church in America. This instantly created a weak, but real money funnel to the USSR via the Church. There were spies (US and USSR) on all sides. It was a fun political move that had nothing to do with the maturity of the American Church and for the longest time it even caused a rupture of governance: for many of the other self-governing Orthodox Churches refused to recognize the action that Moscow had done without talking to anyone (save the Soviets). Last I paid any attention the Patriarch of Constantinople still doesn't officially recognize it.

Now the Moscow Patriarchate, using the same ploys under Putin, is mucking about in the Orthodox Church in the Ukraine and Constantinople wants to give Autocephaly to the Church there to protect it from Russia. Russia sees this as against her political goals (of slowly invading the Ukraine by attrition) and so the Russian Church is threatening to break off communion with anyone who dares contravene them in this dispute. Pot, this is the Kettle. You're black.

Meanwhile... the Catholic Church is having a scandal of global proportions over gay sex happening in seminaries and clergy molesting folks of all ages. Some folks are accusing Francis of participating in the cover-up, which I can see. But some huge portion of this scandal's rooted strength is part of Christians forgetting what "upholds my life" means. We started to think it meant cultural relevancy. We started to think it means communion for the divorced and remarried, for blessing gay couples, for allowing birth control when it was "my conscience" leading me. We started to think it means blending in to the culture instead of standing out. We've even convinced ourselves that "Standing out" is just some sort of prideful, Pharisaical anti-Christian action. Don't judge me.

Both lungs of the Church are breathing the same bad air. It's amusing to hear Istanbul and Moscow accuse each other of trying to be "pope" whilst Rome has the most un-papal Pope in recent memory. Yes, the Pope rules a small city state, and yes the Patriarch of Constantinople runs a smaller one, but still, it is one. Meanwhile the Patriarch of Moscow runs the liturgical ministry of Putin's government. In America, a la carte, most of us just make up our own as we go - and both sides of the Political Spectrum are trying to subvert as many churches as possible into being the American form of Putin's Commissars. Omnes Habent Papae.

Jesus turns to us and says "What were you arguing about on the way?"

There is this sense, I think - not only among Non-Christians, but also among a certain subset of Christians - that the Christian life is supposed to be a good and blessed life. There's the prosperity folks, of course. There's the "God has a plan for your life" people. There are the Calvinists - who taught us that if God is blessing you (with the goods of this world) then you're among the righteous. This led, quickly to nearly everyonedeciding to work hard so that they would have the goods of this world and, therefore, be evidently righteous in God's sight. These all gave rise to the non-Christian folks who believe this is what Christianity is about. They ask (rightly, by this theology) why is it that there are so many poor folks? Why is it that evil exists? Why is it that believers fall under the evident curses of the modern age, War, STDs, and the Internet, just as easily as anyone else? Also those who clearly believe this lie are the statisticians who set out to discover if either religious people are happier than others or if they are unhappier. Equally believing this are those who cite those studies as backing them up as either believers or non-believers.

To this the orthodox Christian has to reply, "Blessing, Schmessing. God said I'd end up dead just like him."

The Apostles themselves fell for this prosperity-power stuff: that's why they were arguing on the Road. They thought "Whoa, if Jesus is King, who do I get to be?" I think I've even heard preachers say this today: You're a prince or princess, live like it!

We have our ideas of success and we want to live up to them. It's no wonder that's what folks think the Gospel really is.

The Lord will uphold my life (as the Psalm for today teaches). He will uphold my cause. He will defend me from the ungodly who seek my life. But my success is not God's purpose. God's purpose is my salvation - my wholeness in his own divine life, Zoe; not my adherence to the standards of success or prosperity or even secular ideas of legality and justice. My only telos or purpose is my living with God for eternity and my living with you in love, here and now; the operative part being In Love. God is love. If I can learn to love you now, to love others, to love all... then when the eternal fires of God's very being encompass me I'll be fine.

When I say, The Lord upholds my life, you might think I mean "I'll get what's due me". And you might want to sit back and see if I get rich as Croesus, or powerful as Putin. Will I no longer be tortured by the law or oppressed by haters? Nope... The Lord upholds my life means my life becomes one with his. In fact, if those things happen to me (wealth, power, or having my head cut off) that's God saving me. That's what it means to "uphold my life": to take even the means of torture and failure (in the eyes of the world) and turn them into the gate of heaven.

The Lord upholds my life means that even if I do follow him, I can still make bad choices, bad business decisions, bad relationship choices. I can still be killed, tortured, nailed to a stick and left to die in the sun, shoved in a borrowed tomb and prevented from even defending myself. But that's God saving me.

More importantly, the folks who "hate my life" who are the "ungodly" are not other Earthlings: for God wants to save them too - as do I. The only enemy I have are the demons. When a human attacks my faith, or undermines my position; when I or others sin and detract from the faith, regardless of any human culpability, the actors are the demons who seek to destroy everything God has made. Man is foremost on that list: if we can forget love for a few moments and kill each other over some political squabble, the demons have won.

The bad air in the Church's lungs, east and west, is demon-scented. It's filled with notes of pride, and mammon-power. It's wafted with compromise and temptation. It all comes from hell. It's only the skillful application of filters that keep us from smelling the sulfur. We take each other to court, break off communion, lead each other into sin; we deck our halls with balls of folly and hate each other for naming them so. Keep the Christians at each other's throats. The demons have done their work well.

We must turn to each other in Love.
We must be little children - of no account, no power, seen and not heard.
Then we must draw each other into that Fire that is God's purpose for us.

If we do not do it, he will do it for us. He will turn this Church right around and take us home. That' won't be pretty. It will hurt. But we will deserve it.

20 September 2018

Sonnet: Purgatio



+JMJ+

I burn! To know the pangs of love. These flames,
That singe & bake, that sear & broil my soul
Are but the birth contractions: payment, toll.
For each of Love's rejections living maims.

See these are not the chains from Marley's hole
How dark & clanging hopeless Without End
But rather here my soul's most comely Friend
In living light my wounded heart makes whole

That to that course my living will should bend
Which e'er she knew but never yet could take
& by these Flames is forged anew to slake
The burning passions which my life could end

Your prayers of Love quench not this Burning lake
They heat the forge my soul's new lamp to make

19 September 2018

So Very Much Love

JMJ

The Readings for the Memorial of Sts Andrew Kim Tae-gon,
& Paul Chong Ha-sang, and Companions, Martyrs

Thursday in the 24th Week of Ordinary Time (B2)
Remittuntur ei peccata multa, quoniam dilexit multum. Cui autem minus dimittitur, minus diligit.
Many sins are forgiven her, because she hath loved much. But to whom less is forgiven, he loveth less. 

It took me years, decades to realize what he said to me. I mean "your sins are forgiven" is clear. But what did I know? I've been finding them at ever turn lately. Deeper and deeper. When he said I had loved much, I thought he was laughing at me. For I have. I was not running away from my sins... they were still in my pockets that night at his feet. What sins I had done? I was just living a fun life. There was the long sexual history, of course, but that turned quickly into a pharisaical judgement of folks who didn't have that history. There was the condemnation of all my sexual partners, the instant feeling of superiority, and the realization that I could always just go to confession. And I knew what it was all about. But I needed to condemn and forgive myself as well.

Sure, I had dissed my parents to pull this off, but it was so important when I did it, right? They were oppressing me into their cultural models of virtue and binding me to the slavery of the middle class. Of course I got out of that house and blew off the family as quick as I could! It has taken most of the last three decades to make up for that. Forgiveness is nothing without healing. "Saved" is the same Greek word as "made whole" and damn it all but I realized I needed my family to be whole. Still, for the longest time, even after he touched me, I didn't care about them. They were always trying to hold me back. And now I had found the real liberation. This Jesus was the freedom I had always craved. Goodbye, Pops.

Then, later, when I realized what my history had done to me, I struggled to reconcile who I was becoming with who I had been. This guy had reached in and broken all my crutches. But I had used them for so long, that I was literally limping. I would wake up and cry out, How can he do that to someone? Take away all that's ever been important and leave them alone? And I was not alone because he was still, right there: his hand on my head, my tears falling. My hands holding. My lips kissing.

I still needed so much to wash his feet and to know this wasn't another hallucination, another lover that took what he wanted and left.

And I found his feet everywhere I looked. And found myself washing them and kissing them over and over. And I realized these were men I had used to get away, to free myself. Sure, I took their money, but sometimes I didn't cuz it was fun. I had made them all into idols and toys... to fill the broken, empty place where Jesus should be. Idols of lust. Idols of liberation. Idols of personal satisfaction. Idols of gosh this is fun tonight. And each man failed to be that replacement for the one thing needed. Each man fell short, and I had to replace him too. There are no Alphas anywhere. Now that Jesus was here where he belonged I could even love these men, even pray for them, beg God to show them some part of wholeness; some path to wholeness. It took forever for that to dawn on me: restored relationships means even restoring these that had been my destruction. God's restoration, his love acting through my love, means healing even these broken lives and hearts.

When it all crashes down, when you hit rock bottom, sure, it's easy to see what good a love like Jesus' can do for you. But when you're not at rock bottom, when you're only aware that something, somewhere, has gone horribly wrong... Love like Jesus offers is only the beginning of a long, slow, climb up. Yes, there glimpses of glory and flashes of light, but mostly, it's just a trudge up out of the pit I dug for myself. Jesus is here walking with me, but I have to walk. It's no less deep because I didn't hit the extremity. 

In the latter times, I felt a call unexpected. Could I just, a little, find something good in the past and bring it with me? And that painful last grip of darkness still clings to me. Can I not just maybe find someone that I can take comfort in (read "use" and "self gratify"). I have loved much, and I have also lost much.

I can be forgiven all of it. But I have to let it all go.

And there's this long, slow trudge, still: where nearly everyone needs my forgiveness and where, I need theirs. And I have to be loving: because what the kids call "slut shaming" is a real thing. We don't shame folks out of their sins. We love them. For most of them, it was a loss of love or a quest for love, or a demand for love on "my own terms", that took them there in the first place. Only Jesus can be that love. And your heart has to open, has to draw them forward, has to let Jesus love them through you.

When he said I had loved much, I thought he was laughing at me. For I had. But decades later, I saw what he saw: I was not running away from my sins... they were still in my pockets that night at his feet. I was running to him. I had heard that this man - above all other men - was capable of being Love so I had to run and give him a chance. I never expected forgiveness. What did I need forgiving for? I was in a place I had chosen. But this love that he saw... that he knew inside his own child. This love that his love awoke in everyone who reached out to him.

This love is still becoming the meaning of my life. I'm still letting it unfold and finding new ways of kissing his feet.

15 September 2018

Thoughts and Prayers

+JMJ+

The Readings for the 24th Sunday in Ordinary Time (B2)



Vade retro me Satana, quoniam non sapis quae Dei sunt, sed quae sunt hominum.
Get behind me Satan, you're not thinking as God does, but as men do.


At vigil Mass on Saturday night I had the second reading: that passage from St James. Well practiced and ready to proclaim. I think I did good. 


But I sat down having heard it come out of my own mouth.  And I finally heard what James was saying.  We hear it as an accusation today because we don't feed the homeless and we are, exactly, inclined to say "sorry, no change but here's my thoughts and prayers." James was talking to a church that cared for the poor, that fed the hungry. James' church was known for her charity. James was speaking in hyperbole to a church that would never leave a homeless person hungry on the street. He was saying... look, Faith without works? You might as well say "Sorry, no change, but here's my thoughts and prayers..."

I can almost imagine the Christians laughing. 

Who would do such a thing?
James was saying, "look you would never do this... so why on earth would you think that believing was enough?"

Their children. That's who would do this... we would do this. We make a mental masturbation out of the faith when we confess doctrines that have no power. When we can claim to follow Jesus but still give in to our sexual whims or anti-Christian ideas adopted from the cultures around us. When we say the things of Jesus, but do the things of the world we scribble on the toe tag of the faith.


Jesus says "take up your cross".
The last thing any of us want to do.
Do something, damn it.
Peter says "Don't do that."
Jesus you have to do something.
Peter says,"You do enough already... and if they kill you, what will they do to us?"
Jesus says, "You're Satan".
The vocations director says "Discernment is an Action Verb".
My spiritual director says, "You're a writer? What are you going to do about it?"
My diet doesn't run itself.
But my inner demon says, just sit here. Stop. You'll be fine.
It's not enough to want to be chaste.
You have to do it.
You can't just believe in the virtues.
You have to acquire them.
Read your office.
Pray hard.
Now get up, get out, and do.
No pain
No gain.
And lots of Satan.

Jesus says "Take up your cross" most of us tend to simply want to wear it like a fashion item.
Jesus say "Sacrifice everything" and most of us think of  football and sneakers.

Our ancestors look at us fighting over sex and money scandals.
They see us in a continual, long, defeatist action of compromise.

Half the Church feeds the homeless but has no sexual morals. All this "pharisee" talk is distracting us from climate issues.
The other doesn't give two flies about the homeless but can't wait to purge the liberals out. 
Where's the church that loves the poor and calls the sinner to repent? Where's the church that preaches the holy mysteries of the Gospel and calls all the world into 

Where's the church of faith and works?

Thoughts. And prayers. And Works.

Where's the church that calls us to charitable actions of repentance and reparation? Where's the prayer that leads to action? Where's the weights to be lifted by hands energized (or wearied) by too much prayer?

Jesus, raise us from the dead.

14 September 2018

Idols of the Post-Moderns

JMJ

The Readings for Our Lady of Sorrows
Saturday in the 23rd Week of Ordinary Time (B2)
Sed quae immolant gentes, daemoniis immolant, et non Deo. Nolo autem vos socios fieri daemoniorum : non potestis calicem Domini bibere, et calicem daemoniorum; non potestis mensae Domini participes esse, et mensae daemoniorum.
But the things which the heathens sacrifice, they sacrifice to devils, and not to God. And I would not that you should be made partakers with devils. You cannot drink the chalice of the Lord, and the chalice of devils: you cannot be partakers of the table of the Lord, and of the table of devils. 

The image above is from the cover of one of my favourite political books, the T.A.Z. or Temporary Autonomous Zone. For a while in the early 90s, I could practically recite the thing. It seemed the perfect image to head up this post.

Paul can be of two minds about the pagan deities in the cultures he visits. On the one hand, there is no such thing as "Hermes" or "Magna Mater", so the idol is nothing. It's unimportant. We should pay it no mind at all. On the other hand, the "energies" or "things" that draw humanity to worship idols, that foment fear and superstition in men's minds: these are demons. So, on the one hand, we know that food offered to idols is - literally - food held up in front of a bit of wood or waved under some metal. Might as well be cooked over wood or in a metal pot for all the "juju" that's in the idol. But on the other hand there are demons involved in the delusion. 

Paul tells us that if you find something in the market, go for it. But if someone tells you that it was sacrificed to idols, then you shouldn't eat it. The issue is that there's no "demonic activity" in the meat. But there are demons tempting others - and you - and even accidental visual collusion is still collusion with the demons.

We don't have a lot of metal or wooden idols in our world any more. So where do we find the demons lurking? 

In Ephesians we find Paul telling us we "wrestle not with flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places." We've made our own idols I think. License and selfish desire, concupiscent ideologies, and false spiritualities all lead us astray. I think it would be easy to make an idol out of some adult entertainment stars, but we're never that poetic. And demons hate actual art. We'd rather make an idol out of a flag, a football team, or an addiction. For St Paul all the idols of Crete or the Areopagus were also centers of cults: communities of folks. But for us, with our isolation, our internet, our buffering, and introversion, we find that our cultus has room for only one or two.

As with the idols St Paul knew, the thing, itself, is nothing. Drugs, Apple Pie, Chevy Trucks, Hell's Angels, Cats...  The thing, itself, is nothing. But the energies that draw us and hold us to the thing, the desire to craft identities around it (instead of our God-given identity in Christ) that's the "powers and principalities" that we're fighting against. These rulers of darkness draw us into their orbits and force us into isolation, away from each other, away from people who worship differently. Today we've even developed drugs so that we can listen more carefully to our preferred voices, shutting out all else. When these demons get their hooks into us it can take decades before healing can begin.

This, then, is the cost of this much more subtle, more more personalized content that's passing for idolatry today. Against this Jesus stands as a "sign of contradiction". Jesus is not about "me" but about "us". Jesus calls us out of our isolation into communion, out of our pallid humanist ideas of "equality" and into constantly kenotic communities. The weaker leads, the stronger serves, the wiser learns at the feet of the fool. God is love: a fiery all-consuming, all-engaging, all-dancing act of self-giving. And we need to be that as well or we're nothing at all like God. The demons hate this.

The image above, as I noted, is from the cover of one of my favourite political books, the T.A.Z. or Temporary Autonomous Zone. It seemed the perfect image to head up this post as it is clearly of an idol that was constructed by an artist. It's a sort of thing the occult community used to call "Chaos Magic". It means nothing to anyone save the artist that made it. But for the rest of us it is beautiful, maybe. Tonight, as I was typing the final lines of this post... I took off my contacts and sat back down to the computer. Only then did I see the demons in the image. I've had this image in my possession for nearly 30 years only now, liberated from the book and propped up on my blogpost did I see them. 

We do not share our demonic communions with anyone at all anymore. Except the demons.  And they like it like that. Divide and conquer. 

Sing my tongue


+JMJ+

A Blessed Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross!

The office hymn today (in the tradition office, pre-V2, and as we used it at my monastery) tells a great mystery, repeated again in Holy Week: singing the whole plan of Salvation. It begins with Matins, in the dark with notes of prehistory and Christmas.

Sing, my tongue, the glorious battle,
Sing the ending of the fray ;
Now above the Cross, the trophy,
Sound the loud triumphant lay :
Tell how Christ, the world's Redeemer,
As a Victim won the day.

God in pity saw man fallen,
Shamed and sunk in misery,
When he fell on death, by tasting
Fruit of the forbidden tree :
Then another Tree was chosen
Which the world from death should free.

Thus the scheme of our salvation
Was of old in order laid ;
That the manifold deceiver's
Art, by art might be outweighed ;
And the lure the foe put forward
Into means of healing made.

Therefore, when the appointed fulness
Of the holy time was come,
He was sent, who maketh all things,
Forth from God's eternal home :
Thus he came to earth, incarnate,
Offspring of a maiden's womb.

Weeps the Infant in the manger
That in Bethlehem's stable stands ;
And his limbs the Virgin Mother
Doth compose in swaddling bands,
Meetly thus in linen folding
Of her God the feet and hands.

To the Trinity be glory
Everlasting, as is meet :
Equal to the Father, equal
To the Son, and Paraclete :
Trinal Unity, whose praises
All created things repeat.  Amen.

But then, the office of Matins continues with glorious psalmody and antiphonal chanting. There's a wonderful reading in this office, appended to this post. Then not until Lauds is the hymn completed. In the final verses, sung to the same tune now that the sun is risen, the last part of the story is told, how this babe...

Thirty years among us dwelling,
His appointed time fulfilled,
Born for this, he meets his Passion,
For that this he freely willed :
On the Cross the Lamb is lifted,
Where his life-Blood shall be spilled.

He endured the nails, the spitting,
Vinegar, and spear, and reed :
From that holy Body broken
Blood and Water forth proceed :
Earth, and stars, and sky, and ocean,
By that flood from stain are freed.

Faithful Cross! above all other,
One and only noble Tree;
None in foliage, none in blossom,
None in fruit thy peer may be :
Sweetest wood, and sweetest iron,
Sweetest weight is hung on thee.

Bend thy boughs, O Tree of glory,
Thy relaxing sinews bend :
For awhile the ancient rigour
That thy birth bestowed, suspend :
And the King of heavenly beauty
On thy bosom gently tend.

Thou alone wast counted worthy
This world's ransom to sustain,
That a shipwrecked race for ever
Might a port of refuge gain :
With the sacred Blood anointed
Of the Lamb for sinners slain.

To the Trinity be glory
Everlasting, as is meet :
Equal to the Father, equal
To the Son, and Paraclete :
Trinal Unity, whose praises
All created things repeat.  Amen.

So all creation joins in the verse and reponse, repeated throughout today's office:

We adore you, O Christ, and we bless you. For by your Cross you have redeemed all the world.

Chosroës, King of Persia, having, in the last days of the reign of the Emperor Phocas, overrun Egypt and Africa, took Jerusalem, where he slaughtered thousands of Christians and carried off to Persia the Cross of the Lord, which Helen had put upon Mount Calvary.  Heraclius, the successor of Phocas, moved by the thought of the hardships and horrid outrages of war, sought for peace, but Chosroës, drunken with conquest, would not allow of it even upon unfair terms.  Heraclius therefore, being set in this uttermost strait, earnestly sought help from God by constant fasting and prayer, and through his good inspiration gathered an army, joined battle with the enemy, and prevailed against three of Chosroës his chief captains, and three armies.

Chosroës was broken by these defeats, and when in his flight, he was about crossing the Tigris, he proclaimed his son Medarses partner in his kingdom.  Chosroës' eldest son Siroës took this slight to heart, and formed a plot to murder his father and brother, which plot he brought to effect soon after they had come home.  Then he got the kingdom from Heraclius upon certain terms, whereof the first was that he should give back the Cross of the Lord Christ.  The Cross therefore was received back after that it had been fourteen years in the power of the Persians, and Heraclius came to Jerusalem and bore it with solemn pomp unto the Mount whereunto the Saviour had borne it.

This event was marked by a famous miracle.  Heraclius, who was adorned with gold and jewels, stayed perforce at the gateway which leadeth unto Mount Calvary, and the harder he strove to go forward, the harder he seemed to be held back, whereat both himself and all they that stood by were sore amazed.  Then spake Zacharias, Patriarch of Jerusalem, saying : See,  O Emperor, that it be not that in carrying the Cross attired in the guise of a Conqueror thou shewest too little of the poverty and lowliness of Jesus Christ.  Then Heraclius cast away his princely raiment and took off his shoes from his feet, and in the garb of a countryman easily finished his journey, and set up the Cross once more in the same place upon Calvary whence the Persians had carried it away.  That the Cross had been put by Heraclius in the same place wherein it had first been planted by the Saviour caused the yearly Feast of the Exaltation of the Holy Cross to become the more famous thenceforward.

12 September 2018

The Courthouse at Apophatics.

JMJ

The Readings for the Memorial of St John Chrysostom
Thursday in the 23rd Week of Ordinary Time (B2)
Si quis autem se existimat scire aliquid, nondum cognovit quemadmodum oporteat eum scire.
If any one imagines that he knows something, he does not yet know as he ought to know. 

There is a strong tradition of negation in Christian theology: of things we cannot know. We travel down this path quietly, patiently, humbly. The first step is abandoning childish ideas of God - Santa Claus, Magic Maker, Karmic Thunder Clap. We have to mourn the passing of these false gods. And then we let others die as well, the divine Therapist, the Matchmaker, the Life Pattern Writer. We give up each of these false gods for the purpose of knowing God as he has revealed himself.

But there are Johnny Rebs of this process too: they want to jettison everything, even the things God has revealed about himself. They want to strike out on their own and they insist that nothing can be known.

Imagine if you introduced yourself to me and I insisted that, even so, I cannot know your name because I cannot trust my knowledge. Or maybe you've told me your name, and I insist that I've discovered your name is actually something else because I sat alone in silence looking off into space and heard a voice saying, "The reader's name is Zaphod." So when you said, "Hi, I'm Samantha!" My response was "I can't grasp knowledge about you at all, but I've understood your name is actually Zaphod." Perhaps you introduce me to members of your family who back up your ludicrous claim of being named "Samantha".  And I point out to them that their life-long association with you does not undo the need for humility and submission to the Unknowable, whose name is actually Zaphod. 

There is a strong tradition of negation in Christian theology. In fact, to claim that I know anything at all about God is silly. God as the very Is of being, the act of essence, the totality of real, the negation of unreality, the loss of nothing... is all beyond my comprehension (even though I have good, poetical mystic words to use).  I have words, but I can't know it.

But to say God can't reveal things about himself, to say that God can't interact with us in any way, shape, or form is to deny the Incarnation. Even the most apophatic of Byzantine mystics will tell us that God is in relationship with us, that in his energies, he is knowable. I might actually go further, but the Neo-apophatics, these folks would deny the very existence of God as "unknowable."

This is the state of most liberal Christian theology today: this trying to call Samantha Zaphod. My experience in the Episcopal Church and among liberal Orthodox and Catholic folks is that this tradition of negation is used, most often, to make room for heresy. "My personal point of view is just another Christian point of view because God is unknowable." You can't tell me I'm wrong: God can't be known. James Martin is no different from Katharine Jefferts Schori or, at least recently, in terms of sexuality, Kalistos Ware. Free for all... 



St Paul has a whole other point for this: we can know nothing therefor we should be as conservative and careful as possible. Paul is quite sure there is no such thing as "Zeus" or "Hecate" and that eating meat from their temples (which is free...) is a good way to get a good meal. But someone might see him being "free in Christ" and be scandalized. So he will give up meat. Forever.

But it doesn't mean he will let Christ be worshiped alongside Zeus because, "hey, we can't know, right?" Paul's quite clear about God's revelation to the Church. Faith is not the same as Knowledge. Faith, rather, is the submission of my experience to the Church's corrective teaching. If I've experienced God in a field of dandelions, that is good. But if I insist, then, that God is a dandelion, or this field of dandelions, or that God lives in this field in a sacramental, focused way. The Church is going to step in and say "No" to that. Faith is accepting that the Church's position is an important, corrective part in this equation. The Church is the control group in my religious exploration.

God says, in the Psalms, "Be still and know that I am God." The Hebrew word there is to "know in the Biblical Sense" as they used to say. It's the same word for the sexual intimacy between man and wife. But also between Eve and the Apple. With God - as with Good and Evil - the experience is the knowledge. We can know something in book learning. We can stalk someone on the internet and think we know them. But we won't know them until we are face to face.

When I surrender, when I stop rebelling and return to the divine union of God and Man that is the Church, when I give up my slavery to my own reasoning, then I can actually know - by revelation - what cannot be known by searching. When I come before God not in Questing Mode, but rather in Adoration Mode - adore from the Latin, "Ad - Ora" or mouth-to-mouth/face-to-face - then I can know God and be known by him, as two lovers to each other.